When FlyCode makes sense
Use FlyCode when you want payment performance tooling around retries, backup payment methods, and broader optimization across a larger payment operation.
Alternative guide
Dunlo vs FlyCode
FlyCode is an AI payment recovery platform for companies that want optimization across retries, payment methods, and payment providers. Dunlo is narrower: Stripe-first failed-payment recovery for founders who want clear emails, flat pricing, and a recovery workflow they can understand.
Conversion path
Not ready to connect Stripe?
Use the benchmark first. It gives visitors a useful estimate before signup and keeps the next step lighter than connecting an account immediately.
Dunlo fit
You use Stripe and want to recover failed payments without enterprise setup.
You want to preserve customer trust with plain-language recovery emails.
You want clear recovered-revenue tracking without giving up a recovery percentage.
When Dunlo is the cleaner start
Use Dunlo when the core problem is simpler: failed Stripe invoices are turning into silent churn and you need a clear customer recovery workflow.
The real decision
This is not enterprise intelligence versus nothing. It is optimization depth versus a focused, founder-readable recovery layer.
Comparison
What changes in practice
This comparison is based on public product pages and documentation. Dunlo details reflect the current beta offer.
| Criteria | FlyCode | Dunlo beta |
|---|---|---|
| Primary job | Payment recovery and authorization optimization using AI retry and payment-method logic. | Customer-safe failed Stripe payment recovery with failure-code emails and founder escalation. |
| Best fit | Teams with enough failed-payment volume to justify deeper payment optimization. | Stripe-first SaaS founders who want a focused recovery workflow before payment ops becomes a department. |
| Customer communication | Includes custom failed-payment emails coordinated with the retry engine. | Email sequences are built around the Stripe failure reason and the customer action needed. |
| Pricing posture | Public pages emphasize recovery lift and enterprise-style payment optimization. | Flat beta pricing direction, free during beta, and no recovered-revenue percentage. |
| Founder escalation | Not positioned around founder-reviewed personal drafts as the core workflow. | High-value failures can be escalated into a founder-reviewed personal email draft. |
Who should use FlyCode
- You want a payment optimization platform, not just dunning emails.
- You care about backup payment methods and advanced retry intelligence.
- Your failed-payment volume is large enough to justify a deeper optimization layer.
Who should use Dunlo
- You use Stripe and want to recover failed payments without enterprise setup.
- You want to preserve customer trust with plain-language recovery emails.
- You want clear recovered-revenue tracking without giving up a recovery percentage.
Beta transparency
What can be verified today.
Dunlo publishes assumptions, recovery mechanics, and its proof policy before it publishes customer outcomes.
During beta, customer outcomes are published only with approval and enough context to be useful.
Visible assumptions
The public benchmark exposes the illustrative failed-payment bands and 62% recoverability assumption used in its model. Updated July 2026.
Visible mechanics
Failure reasons, recovery timing, customer update links, and founder review are documented before signup.
Visible proof policy
Customer metrics and stories remain private until the sample is useful and the customer approves publication.
Free beta
Recover failed payments before they become churn.
Choose FlyCode when payment optimization is already a payment-ops priority. Choose Dunlo when you want a focused Stripe recovery layer that explains failures, contacts customers clearly, and keeps pricing simple.