dunlo
Alternative guide

Dunlo vs Recurflux

Recurflux is a broader retention platform covering failed payments, smart retries, card health, cancellation flows, win-back, checkout recovery, and mobile recovery through RevenueCat. Dunlo is intentionally smaller: a Stripe-first tool for founders who want failed payment recovery without configuring a full retention suite.

Conversion path

Not ready to connect Stripe?

Use the benchmark first. It gives visitors a useful estimate before signup and keeps the next step lighter than connecting an account immediately.

Dunlo fit

You are Stripe-first and failed payments are the leak you want to fix first.

You prefer a focused tool over a retention platform with many flows.

You want founder escalation for high-value failed payments, not only automated campaigns.

Comparison

What changes in practice

This comparison is based on public product pages and documentation. Dunlo details reflect the current beta offer.

CriteriaRecurfluxDunlo beta
Failed payment recoveryYes, with smart retry scheduling, recovery emails, hosted payment pages, and analytics.Yes, with Stripe failure-code-specific emails and founder-visible escalation.
ScopeBroad retention suite: failed payments, card health, cancellation flow builder, subscription pause, checkout recovery, disputes, and win-back.Narrow recovery layer: failed Stripe payments, email sequences, Morning Brief, and founder escalation.
Payment stackSupports Stripe, Paddle, Razorpay, and RevenueCat, with RevenueCat recovery handled by email because app stores own the retry cycle.Stripe-only by design.
Founder escalation AINot positioned around founder-reviewed personal email drafts for high-value accounts.Yes. Dunlo drafts a personal email when automation should not be the only touch.
Pricing modelFlat monthly pricing: Rise at $59/mo up to $75k MRR, Surge at $159/mo up to $250k MRR.Free during beta. Planned tiers start at $19/mo, with no recovered-revenue cut.
Setup motionConnect processor credentials in under 60 seconds, then customize defaults if needed.Connect Stripe, keep the product surface focused, and start monitoring without a retention-suite rollout.

Who should use Recurflux

  • You want payment recovery plus cancellation prevention, win-back, checkout recovery, and card health.
  • You run multiple processors or need RevenueCat recovery for mobile subscriptions.
  • You are comfortable with a broader retention system because retention is already a multi-channel problem.

Who should use Dunlo

  • You are Stripe-first and failed payments are the leak you want to fix first.
  • You prefer a focused tool over a retention platform with many flows.
  • You want founder escalation for high-value failed payments, not only automated campaigns.

Public proof

Trust built from visible mechanics, not vague uplift claims.

Dunlo is still in beta, so the page shows what can be verified today: assumptions, recovery mechanics, and a clear policy for publishing customer proof.

SignalEvidenceSource
Benchmark

Failure-rate ranges are visible before signup.

The public calculator shows MRR bands, estimated failed MRR, and recovery assumptions without asking for an email first.

Open benchmark
Mechanics

The workflow is failure-code first.

Dunlo is built around Stripe decline reasons, timed emails, hosted update links, and founder escalation.

See failure codes
Policy

Proof is published only when it is approved.

Customer screenshots, recovery stories, and beta metrics stay private until the sample is useful and the customer signs off.

Read proof policy

Free beta

Recover failed payments before they become churn.

Choose Recurflux if you want one platform for payment recovery, cancellation prevention, win-back, and multiple processors. Choose Dunlo if you want a focused Stripe recovery layer with a simpler setup, lower planned entry price, and founder escalation built into the workflow.

Start with Dunlo

Sources